January 2006 Archives

Reaction to Alito's confirmation

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Editorializes the San Jose Mercury News on Alito's confirmation:

To no one's surprise, the Senate has confirmed Samuel Alito Jr. to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the U.S. Supreme Court. He was sworn in shortly after the partisan 58-42 vote.

A last-ditch attempt by the liberal wing of the Democratic Party to filibuster Alito's nomination in the Senate failed miserably, as it should have. There was no overriding reason to use a filibuster against Alito.

Thanks to a group of seven Republican and seven Democratic senators, the Senate was persuaded not to use the filibuster against court nominees except in extreme cases. The agreement paved the way for a full Senate vote on several Appeals Court nominees and avoided a fight over the use of the filibuster itself.

Too often Democrats used the filibuster against lower court nominees. As a result, many Republican senators threatened to change the Senate rules to eliminate any filibusters on court nominees.

The agreement to use the filibuster sparingly was a sensible one. Unfortunately, 24 Democratic senators and one independent did not agree and voted to filibuster Alito. That was a misuse of the filibuster and a breech of the agreement to use the vote-delaying tactic only in extreme situations.

There is no doubt that Alito has been a conservative judge. But in his 15 years on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Philadelphia, he demonstrated a firm knowledge of constitutional law and was hardly an extremist.

From The Voice of America:

The U.S. Senate has confirmed Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in a largely party-line vote. He is poised to become the 110th justice on the high court, succeeding Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Senator Ted Stevens, an Alaska Republican, announced the vote as he presided over the Senate.

STEVENS: "On this vote, the ayes are 58, the nays are 42. The president's nomination of Samuel A. Alito, Jr. of New Jersey to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is confirmed."

The vote fell generally along party lines, with all but one of the Senate's majority Republicans voting in favor of Judge Samuel Alito. All but four of the Democrats voted against the nomination.

The lone Republican who opposed Alito was Senator Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, who is facing a tough reelection battle this year in the Democrat-leaning state.

The confirmation vote culminated weeks of often bitter, partisan debate over the nomination at the start of the mid-term election year.

Sex tapes of the rich and famous

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

From The Olympian in Olympia, Washington:

In a Hollywood museum specializing in erotica, there lies a grainy tape of a woman having sex with a man on a couch. The museum says it’s widely believed, though denied by her estate, that the woman is Marilyn Monroe, circa 1948.

Fast-forward some 60 years, past Rob Lowe and Pamela Anderson and Paris Hilton. The latest celebrity sex tape contains 14 minutes of seriously hard-core action between actor Colin Farrell and a former Playboy Playmate, punctuated by dialogue such as: “Where’s the zoom on this?”

But like his predecessors in the genre, Farrell’s career is not likely to be harmed at all. In fact, it could even get bigger. It seems what we expect from our celebrities is radically different from what we expect from, say, our politicians. Or ourselves.

“The public is very forgiving,” says Kate White, editor-in-chief of Cosmpolitan. “And very intrigued. It’s not like, ’Oh no Colin, not you!’ ”

Brokeback mountain leads Oscars

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Well this ought to give the homophobes in the White House and Congress heartburn this morning.

Brokebrack Mountain, director Ang Lee's story about two gay cowboys, leads the Oscar nominations.

This will, no doubt, result in the American Family Association and other gay-bashing conservative organizations calling for a boycott of the Oscar telecast.

RIP Coretta Scott King

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Coretta Scott King, window of Dr. Martin Luther King, is dead at 78.

T&A and cashing in

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

013006shari.jpgAnd while we're on the subject of Enron and cashing in, let's offer a salute to Shari Daughterty.

Shari who? She's the sweet young thing (OK, maybe not that sweet) with the boobs and butt standing naked by a sports car in front of the Enron Building.

So what does this T&A have to do with the with the downfall of a greedy giant corporation?

A lot, actually. Shari, you see, worked for Enron during its go-go days and was left looking for a way to pay the rent after the bubble burst and the company went under. So she submitted some photos to Playboy for their "Women of Enron" issue and got the gig.

That let her parade around in her altogether to the amusement of all and get paid for it to boot. The Women of Enron feature started a whole string of "Women of" companies photo spreads for the skin mag, including the women of Starbucks, McDonalds, Home Depot and even Wal-Mart.

Shari got a chance to cash in her company's greed. Don't you just love America?

(Photo courtesy of and Copyright Playboy Magazine)

Enron and cashing in

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

This week, two of the institigators of Enron's billion-bilking ways will face the music in court as foemer CEO Key Lay and his chief honcho go on trial for cooking the books and bringing the Energy giant down.

For many, Lay and cronies exemplify corporate greed at its worst.

As Business Week puts it:

The only remaining question of great consequence about Enron is whether its prime movers, Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling, will go to prison for their part in its transformation from icon of New Age corporate cool to synonym for Bubble Era greed and deceit. As the pair go on trial on Jan. 30 in Houston, it will be important to keep in mind that the jury's decision will serve only to fix criminal culpability. Even if Lay and Skilling are acquitted, the trial holds zero hope of redemption for Enron's Big Two. History's verdict is already in, and it is harsh: As two of the most inept executives in business history, Lay and Skilling are heavily to blame for the demise of a company that once employed 31,000 people and had a stock market value of $35 billion but which survives today in shriveled form under the protection of the bankruptcy code.

We should also remember that Ken Lay is a good friend of the President, a failed oil executive named George W. Bush.

Big oil: The rich get richer

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Exxon capped a record year with a quarterly profit of $10 billion (yes, that billion with a "b").

Let's see. Mr. and Mrs. America need a second mortgage to pay for a tank of gas and big oil keeps raking in more and more big bucks. An oil man is in the White House.

You don't need a doctorate in economics to see the truth here.

From Reuters:

Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's largest publicly traded oil company, on Monday reported a quarterly profit of more than $10 billion, capping a record year dominated by a surge oil and gas prices.

The results pushed up Exxon's profit for the year to a staggering $36.13 billion -- bigger than the economies of 125 of the 184 countries ranked by the World Bank. Profit was up 42 percent from the record results of 2004.

The record earnings are expected to spur calls from politicians and consumer groups for special taxes on Big Oil, as U.S. drivers fume over high gasoline prices.

Stern Clouds on the horizon

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Widespread reaction to Howard Stern's first days on Sirius sat radio:

From Howard Reich at the Chicago Tribune:

The words tumbled out in a torrent--vulgar descriptions of body parts, bodily functions and the kinkiest sexual practices.

The speakers seemed to revel in the telling, reiterating the blue phrases like a mantra, then laughing uproariously at each repetition.

But was it funny? Was it supposed to be?

Each listener who tuned in Monday morning to Howard Stern's debut on Sirius Satellite Radio answered those questions individually, for humor remains as subjective as any other art form.

Yet to those who work in comedy, Stern--and those who follow him into the anything-goes realm of satellite radio--faces a steep artistic challenge. For if anyone on satellite can say anything, will audiences be amused by streams of profanity for long?

"My experience is that unless you keep some kind of taboo, you lose the force of any kind of language," said Bernard Sahlins, co-founder of Chicago's long-standing comedy troupe Second City, interviewed before Stern's satellite debut.

"If the language becomes generally broadcast, approved, misused, it becomes meaningless.

"It has neither mystery nor effectiveness," Sahlins said.

The Detroit Free Press:

The new Howard Stern satellite radio show began Monday with all the expected hoopla.

He put to rest rumors that he married his longtime girlfriend, model Beth Ostrosky -- in a comment complete with a federally banned expletive.

"I am not married. It's a nice feeling that we get along great. We're very happy and I don't want to (expletive) it up," said Stern, who is finally free of government decency laws on Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (Channel 100).

Stern has promised everything from stripper poles to live sex on his new show. Yet he maintained his show was more about ideas. Cursing, he said, would be part of the natural progression of speech.

"I feel this is a culmination of dreams for me," Stern said in an on-air news conference. "The only limit is our mind," he said.

My take:

I've never found Stern funny. He's the obnoxious kid from school who delights in yelling dirty words to shock people, a buffoon who substitutes obscenity for humor and then claims it's all about free speech.

It ain't. Richard Pryor was both obscene and funny. Stern is just obscene. There's a difference and Sirius radio, in a to-the-death fight with the much larger XM-radio network, is gambling that it can attract more listeners by putting Stern on the air and letting him shout "fuck" to his heart's content.

With luck, their attempt will fail miserably.

Death of a journalist

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

David E. Rosenbaum, a longtime editor and reporter in the Washington bureau of the New York Times, died yesterday after being beaten and robbed Friday night near his home in upper Northwest Washington.

Rosenbaum, 63, died at 7:10 p.m. at Howard University Hospital, where he was treated for a head injury suffered during the attack on Gramercy Street NW, said Philip Taubman, chief of the Times's Washington bureau.

Doctors had operated on Rosenbaum on Saturday to relieve pressure on his brain.

D.C. police were canvassing the neighborhood yesterday for clues in the attack, which occurred in a quiet section between Connecticut and Wisconsin avenues. No arrests had been made.

"David was one of the most accomplished journalists of his generation in Washington," Taubman said last night.

"He could do anything, and he did so many things brilliantly," Taubman said. "He was an all-time great, versatile reporter who could tackle any subject" and wrote about the most abstruse matters, particularly in financial areas, with "remarkable lucidity, speed" and sophistication.

Rosenbaum joined the Washington bureau in 1968 and, with the exception of three years as an editor in New York, had spent his entire Times career there. He retired late last month but was to continue contributing to the Times.

There's trouble in River City

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
In Iowa, where you would think such thinks would be illegal, it is legal to take nude pictures of girls under 18 as long as the photographys aren't explicit or depict sexual acts.

Hmmmmm.

According to the Des Moines Register:

The Rachel Huggins case could send the message that Iowans can take pictures of naked children in provocative poses and get away with it, but tightening the law in a fair way might be impossible because only a fine line separates a harmless snapshot, art and sexual exploitation, advocates say.

Iowa's exploitation law allows for nude photography, even if a child is younger than 18 and not a relative -- as long as it doesn't depict explicit images or one of several specific sexual acts.

For instance, prosecutors in Jasper County this week said it wasn't automatically a crime for a middle-aged man to snap photographs of a fully or partially unclothed teenage girl.

According to court documents, Rachel Huggins told investigators in 2004 that when she was 14 or 15, Peter Sciarrotta, now 47, took numerous photographs of her wearing a see-through slip in his basement studio, where he shot senior photos and cut hair.

That's why he's an organist

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
A former church organist from Naugatuck has been sentenced to 15 years in prison on child sex charges.

Robert Nelson, 51, pleaded guilty in October to sexually assaulting four young girls. He was sentenced Friday to 15 years in prison and 15 years probation.

Police say the assaults began in 2000 and lasted through 2004.

Nelson brought the victims to Six Flags amusement park, the mall and back and forth from Immanuel St. James Episcopal Church in Derby, where he was the church organist, according to court documents.

He took nude photographs of the girls, showed them pornography and had sex with them, police said.

Nelson apologized Friday in court.

Teen queen bares not quite all

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Teen queen Lindsay Lohan
Teen queen Lindsay Lohan reveals a lot in this issue of Vanity Fair.  And yes she does get nude.  And of course it is reported that it is all due to dog-toting socialite Paris Hilton.

Recall, that Lindsay Lohan's inspiration for her nude shot, topless and covered of course, was Paris Hilton.

A source told In Touch in September, "It was Paris Hilton's recent Vanity Fair cover, where she's topless and covering her breasts with her arms, that inspired Lindsay to push the envelope even further."

Drugs, Bulimia and Pregnancy Rumors:

The teen queen admits in the new issue of Vanity Fair that her low body weight was due to bulimia. She also tells the magazine that she has experimented with drugs in the past.

Not with my daughter you don't

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Howard Stern's daughter Emily has pulled out of a satirical stage performance in which she appears nude, apparently worried that enemies of her father would distribute pictures of her on the Internet.

Emily Stern, 22, has starred since November in "Kaballah," staged by the Jewish Theater of New York at the Triad Theater, 158 W. 72nd St. She has been playing Madonna, the pop singer who gained an interest in the mystic Jewish form of study.

Tuesday, the company abruptly canceled its scheduled performances for this week at the 136-seat theater, saying Stern had dropped out after learning that she had become the subject of rumors on several Howard Stern fan club Web sites.

"She's very scared now," said Isi Tenonbom, a spokeswoman for the Jewish Theater, who said the company was looking for a replacement actress.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from January 2006 listed from newest to oldest.

December 2005 is the previous archive.

February 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.